Harvard Law Review editors vote against publishing article about Gaza genocide: report

Published
0

After commissioning an essay from Palestinian scholar Rabea Eghbariah, editors at the Harvard Law Review voted against publishing it after “concerns had arisen about staffers being offended or harassed”, a report by The Intercept has revealed.

In one of his responses to the editors, Eghbariah wrote, “This is discrimination. Let’s not dance around it — this is also outright censorship. It is dangerous and alarming.” Eghbaraiah’s email to the editors was shared with The Intercept.

The essay, “The Ongoing Nakba”, would have been the first from a Palestinian scholar published by the journal. An editor at Harvard Law Review said that Israeli scholars were well-represented in the magazine but not Palestinians.

Eghbariah’s article was published on Tuesday night at The Nation, under the headline “The Harvard Law Review Refused to Run This Piece About Genocide in Gaza.”

Opinion

Editorial

Talks, at last
03 Oct, 2026

Talks, at last

YESTERDAY, the government and opposition finally sat across from each other and talked. A government-led coalition,...
IWT’s future
03 Oct, 2026

IWT’s future

TOGETHER with the Kashmir dispute, India’s unilateral suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty has become the biggest...
Pained minds
03 Oct, 2026

Pained minds

IN Pakistan, mental healthcare is wedged between two extremes — a luxury or a stigma. Estimates cited by the...
Risks ahead
Updated 02 Oct, 2026

Risks ahead

To think that the government would rather push out an elected government than grant a single prisoner some facilities does not square up rationally.
Exit from Iraq
02 Oct, 2026

Exit from Iraq

AMERICAN and British troops have once again shipped out of Iraq. On Wednesday, the foreign forces left the Arab...
Lahore’s ozone warning
02 Oct, 2026

Lahore’s ozone warning

LAHORE has received another warning that its air pollution crisis cannot be treated as a problem that begins with...