Inheritance rights

Published
0

THE Federal Shariat Court’s ruling that it is un-Islamic to deprive a woman of her right to inheritance is a watershed moment in Pakistan’s struggle for gender equality. For generations, women across the country have been systematically denied what is rightfully theirs, through coercion, social pressure and outright criminality. Although clear religious injunctions, as well as legal protections exist, numerous exploitative customs rob women of their share in property. The most common of these is haq bakhshwana, where women are forced to sign away their inheritance in favour of male relatives. In order to keep the property within the family, many women are married to their paternal cousins or forced into exchange marriages (watta satta). In extreme cases, women are symbolically ‘married’ to the Quran to permanently exclude them from any inheritance — an appalling distortion of religious beliefs. Women who insist on claiming their inheritance face threats, social stigma, or even violence. They may be labelled as greedy or disloyal and accused of breaking family ties. Some families sever ties with daughters or sisters who demand their share, making it an emotionally and socially costly battle.

The law, in theory, is clear. The Muslim Personal Law (1961) guarantees women their inheritance, and Section 498-A of the Pakistan Penal Code criminalises depriving women of their property rights. Additionally, the Enforcement of Women’s Property Rights Act (2020) was passed to facilitate women in reclaiming their inheritance. Yet, these legal provisions remain largely ineffective due to weak enforcement, judicial delays, and cultural resistance. Now, with the FSC’s unequivocal ruling, the state must take concrete steps to enforce these laws. A comprehensive awareness campaign should educate citizens about both the religious validity and legal protection of women’s inheritance rights. Law-enforcement agencies must be sensitised to treat instances of inheritance deprivation as criminal cases, rather than private family disputes. The judiciary should establish specialised tribunals to expedite inheritance cases. Government departments should monitor inheritance transfers, especially in areas where exploitative customs are prevalent, to ensure compliance with the law. The FSC’s judgement invoking “Amr bil Maroof Wa Nahi Anil Munkar” (enjoining good and forbidding wrong) as a state duty under the Enforcement of Sharia Act is particularly significant. It places responsibility on government institutions to actively protect women’s rights rather than remain passive observers.

Published in Dawn, March 21st, 2025

Opinion

Editorial

Fixing bond markets
Updated 01 Oct, 2026

Fixing bond markets

Pension funds, insurance companies, mutual funds, retail investors, and eventually, foreign investors must become bigger participants in the market.
Call centre rackets
01 Oct, 2026

Call centre rackets

A NUMBER of recent raids conducted by the authorities in different cities point to the growing threat fraudulent ...
Homeward bound
01 Oct, 2026

Homeward bound

FIVE months after Somali pirates captured an oil tanker carrying a 19-member multinational crew, Somali maritime...
Kashmir unresolved
Updated 30 Sep, 2026

Kashmir unresolved

The just solution lies in India addressing the issue through a trilateral dialogue involving the legitimate representatives of the Kashmiri people and Pakistan.
Water shortage
30 Sep, 2026

Water shortage

THAT the country is entering the Rabi season with an anticipated water shortage of nearly 25pc, the lowest carryover...
Young hearts
30 Sep, 2026

Young hearts

THE observance may have passed, but the message of World Heart Day should not fade with it. The occasion is a useful...