KARACHI: The Sindh High Court on Monday directed the provincial authorities to file their respective comments on a constitutional petition challenging an amendment to the Sindh Local Government Act that allows dual nationals to contest the local bodies elections.

A two-judge bench, headed by Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, also issued a notice to the provincial government law officer and put off the hearing to a date to be later pronounced by the court office.

The petition was filed by a practising lawyer, Advocate Zulfiqar Ali Domki, who impleaded the chief secretary and secretaries of the local government and law departments as respondents.

The petitioner submitted that the Sindh Assembly on Aug 11 passed the Sindh Local Government (Third Amendment) Bill, 2015, whereby clause (c) of sub-section 1 of Section 36 was omitted. The clause describes in detail some 11 conditions for the disqualification of a candidate from contesting the local government election.

He said the amendment allowed citizens with dual nationality to contest the upcoming local government elections.

Advocate Domki said the omitted clause stated: “He ceases to be a citizen of Pakistan; or acquires the citizenship of a foreign state” as one of the conditions on the basis of which a prospective candidate could be disqualified or disbarred from contesting the local bodies election.

He submitted that Article 63 (1) of the Constitution clearly states that a person shall be ‘disqualified from being elected or chosen as, and from being, a member of the Majlis-e-Shoora (Parliament), if he ceases to be a citizen of Pakistan, or acquires the citizenship of a foreign state’. “This clearly means that a person acquiring the citizenship of a foreign state cannot be either elected or chosen or continue to remain as a parliamentarian if he acquires the citizenship of a foreign state,” he added.

The petitioner said that dual nationality implied divided loyalties and thus those individuals who adopted nationalities other than Pakistani should not be allowed to contest the elections and represent the people of Pakistan.

He said the amendment was made with malafide intent and was not sustainable in law. “Actually the amendment was made to accommodate near and dear ones of ministers, MNAs and MPAs of the ruling party who are dual nationality holders,” he added.

He pleaded to the court to declare that the amendment was illegal, malafide, void ab initio, unconstitutional and of no legal effect.

Published in Dawn, September 8th, 2015

On a mobile phone? Get the Dawn Mobile App: Apple Store | Google Play

Opinion

Editorial

Fixing bond markets
Updated 01 Oct, 2026

Fixing bond markets

Pension funds, insurance companies, mutual funds, retail investors, and eventually, foreign investors must become bigger participants in the market.
Call centre rackets
01 Oct, 2026

Call centre rackets

A NUMBER of recent raids conducted by the authorities in different cities point to the growing threat fraudulent ...
Homeward bound
01 Oct, 2026

Homeward bound

FIVE months after Somali pirates captured an oil tanker carrying a 19-member multinational crew, Somali maritime...
Kashmir unresolved
Updated 30 Sep, 2026

Kashmir unresolved

The just solution lies in India addressing the issue through a trilateral dialogue involving the legitimate representatives of the Kashmiri people and Pakistan.
Water shortage
30 Sep, 2026

Water shortage

THAT the country is entering the Rabi season with an anticipated water shortage of nearly 25pc, the lowest carryover...
Young hearts
30 Sep, 2026

Young hearts

THE observance may have passed, but the message of World Heart Day should not fade with it. The occasion is a useful...