At the crossroads

Published
2

OVER the next few days, the joint US-Israeli aggression against Iran can go either of two ways: nascent attempts at a ceasefire, in which Pakistan is playing a major role, succeed and lead to a long-term settlement. Or, if ominous reports that the US president is buying time to move in more troops and invade Iranian territory are to be believed, the war gets much worse.

In both scenarios, the Trump administration holds the key: it can either choose a sobering climbdown leading to peace, or continue the doomed march towards an even larger war. There is a very slim window for diplomacy, and if this chance is lost, it is unclear when the next may come.

The US has reportedly sent ceasefire demands to Iran via Pakistan, while Turkiye is also engaging in shuttle diplomacy. Iranian officials are said to have termed US demands “unreasonable”.

Pakistan and other regional states realise that if this conflict spirals further out of control, it will create a maelstrom that will consume the entire region, while dealing a huge blow to the global economy. All rational states wish to avoid such a dystopian scenario, except the US and Israel.

The fact is that even close American allies are now voicing their disapproval at the aggression. For example, the German president has termed the war a “breach of international law”. Coming from the leader of a country that goes out of its way for Israel, this is significant. Similarly, the EU’s foreign policy chief has said “this is not Europe’s war”, while the Omani foreign minister has observed that “this war is not of [Iran’s] making”. Unable even to assemble a coalition of the willing to prosecute this illegal war, it is time for President Donald Trump to step back and create conditions conducive to a ceasefire and long-term calm.

If there are negotiations, it is relevant to ask what will be on the agenda. The Iranians want guarantees they will not be attacked again, and compensation for war damage. This demand is reasonable. However, if the US keeps parroting Israeli talking points, and insists on maximalist demands from Tehran, such as an end to its ballistic missile programme, then the talks are unlikely to go far.

For peace, the US and its regional proxy Israel must immediately cease hostilities, and create the right conditions for dialogue. Once matters calm down, states in the neighbourhood — Iran, the Gulf sheikhdoms, Turkiye, Iraq etc — must create a new regional architecture among themselves that promises collective security.

As the past few weeks have shown, the US has only one permanent interest in the region: Israel. It cares little for its Arab allies, which is why these states must forge a new, region-led security order.

Published in Dawn, March 26th, 2026

Opinion

Editorial

Fixing bond markets
01 Oct, 2026

Fixing bond markets

THE plan to deepen the domestic local currency bond market by allowing the public to trade government securities...
Call centre rackets
01 Oct, 2026

Call centre rackets

A NUMBER of recent raids conducted by the authorities in different cities point to the growing threat fraudulent ...
Homeward bound
01 Oct, 2026

Homeward bound

FIVE months after Somali pirates captured an oil tanker carrying a 19-member multinational crew, Somali maritime...
Kashmir unresolved
Updated 30 Sep, 2026

Kashmir unresolved

The just solution lies in India addressing the issue through a trilateral dialogue involving the legitimate representatives of the Kashmiri people and Pakistan.
Water shortage
30 Sep, 2026

Water shortage

THAT the country is entering the Rabi season with an anticipated water shortage of nearly 25pc, the lowest carryover...
Young hearts
30 Sep, 2026

Young hearts

THE observance may have passed, but the message of World Heart Day should not fade with it. The occasion is a useful...