LAHORE: The Lahore High Court has set aside the recovery of salaries and other benefits with retrospective effect from over 200 lecturers working in different education institutions.

Justice Sajid Mahmood Sethi passed the order allowing the petitions filed by Amna Mubarik and others.

The petitioner challenged the actions of the provincial government regarding reduction or reassessment of their pay retrospectively and the recovery of the past salaries as well.

Advocate Safdar Shaheen Pirzada, the counsel in several petitions, contended that the pay protection awarded to the petitioners had been withdrawn by the respondents in violation of the well-celebrated principles of the laws.

He argued that the substantive rights of the petitioners cannot be affected retrospectively.

He cited a judgement, saying the financial benefits accrued and already received by the employees in pursuance of an illegal order passed by the competent authority, cannot be recovered from them.

On the other hand, Assistant Advocate General Saad bin Ghazi defended the impugned actions, saying the issue involved in the petitions regarding fixation of basic pay of contract employees at the time of their regularisation had been settled by the Supreme Court.

Even otherwise, he said, petitioners were civil servants and their petitions were not maintainable.

However, the law officer could not rebut the stance of the petitioners that pursuant to a 2016 judgement, the relief of pay protection was being granted to other similar employees, but same was being denied only to the extent of two districts.

In his verdict, Justice Sethi observed that to claim such a right as has been granted to similarly placed other persons, is the fundamental right of petitioners and the Constitution extends protection to their right.

The judge allowed the petitions and set aside the impugned actions being illegal and without any lawful authority.

The judge remitted the matter to the Punjab chief secretary with a direction to decide the same afresh keeping in view the court’s observations preferably within a period of 30 days.

Published in Dawn, March 7th, 2025

Opinion

Editorial

Fixing bond markets
Updated 01 Oct, 2026

Fixing bond markets

Pension funds, insurance companies, mutual funds, retail investors, and eventually, foreign investors must become bigger participants in the market.
Call centre rackets
01 Oct, 2026

Call centre rackets

A NUMBER of recent raids conducted by the authorities in different cities point to the growing threat fraudulent ...
Homeward bound
01 Oct, 2026

Homeward bound

FIVE months after Somali pirates captured an oil tanker carrying a 19-member multinational crew, Somali maritime...
Kashmir unresolved
Updated 30 Sep, 2026

Kashmir unresolved

The just solution lies in India addressing the issue through a trilateral dialogue involving the legitimate representatives of the Kashmiri people and Pakistan.
Water shortage
30 Sep, 2026

Water shortage

THAT the country is entering the Rabi season with an anticipated water shortage of nearly 25pc, the lowest carryover...
Young hearts
30 Sep, 2026

Young hearts

THE observance may have passed, but the message of World Heart Day should not fade with it. The occasion is a useful...