‘I always knew they were a paper tiger’: Could war on Iran create unbridgeable rift between US and Nato?

Published
3
US President Donald Trump speaks during a press conference, at the Nato summit in The Hague, Netherlands, June 25, 2025. — Reuters
US President Donald Trump speaks during a press conference, at the Nato summit in The Hague, Netherlands, June 25, 2025. — Reuters

“Paper tiger”. “Cowards”. As US President Donald Trump grapples with the fallout of his war on Iran, much of his anger has been redirected onto another target: the Nato military alliance.

Enraged by European allies who have refused to back his fight, rejected demands to help reopen the Strait of Hormuz, or denied access to US jets, Trump’s tone has grown increasingly menacing.

“I was never swayed by Nato. I always knew they were a paper tiger,” Trump told British newspaper The Telegraph on Wednesday, suggesting he was strongly considering pulling the United States out.

The ire from the president — who has also blasted Nato allies as “cowards” over Iran — is just the latest existential crisis to grip the 77-year-old alliance since his return to power last January.

A few months ago, he rocked Nato’s foundations by threatening to seize the vast Arctic island of Greenland from fellow member Denmark — before abruptly backing off.

That followed him repeatedly pulling the rug from under Ukraine in the war against Russia, threats not to protect allies if they don’t spend more on defence, and warnings that Washington could yank troops from Europe.

But while previous storms have blown over, there is increasing anxiety among some US allies that this time the damage might be harder to recover from.

“Day by day it is getting more serious,” one European diplomat at Nato told AFP, speaking on condition of anonymity.

Trump has long railed against Nato, calling it “obsolete” in 2017 and mulling withdrawing during his first term in office.

Fuelling the worry is that this time round it is not only Trump that is sounding off about the alliance from Washington, but other traditional supporters.

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio warned on Tuesday that the United States “is going to have to reexamine” its relationship with Nato after several European countries restricted the US military from using bases on their soil.

“When we need them to allow us to use their military bases, their answer is ‘No?’ Then why are we in Nato? You have to ask that question,” he told Fox News.

Former US ambassador to Nato Ivo Daalder argued that while Nato members have handled many disagreements in the past, this standoff threatened the vital glue of trust holding the alliance together.

“The last two weeks have brought relations between the president and European allies to a boiling point,” Daalder, who served under President Barack Obama, wrote in an online post.

“This is by far the worst crisis Nato has ever confronted.”

Stronger than ever?

After bending over backwards repeatedly to keep Trump happy — including a pledge to ramp up spending at Nato’s summit last year — European allies seem unwilling to play ball this time on Iran.

As Trump didn’t consult them before launching the war, there is little appetite to help clear up the problems it has unleashed and risk becoming further embroiled.

But while doomsayers see an unbridgeable rift opening up — others insist that Nato will pull through yet again.

“It has kept us safe for many decades, and we are fully committed to Nato,” British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said on Wednesday.

Alliance chief Mark Rutte — dubbed a “Trump whisperer” — is central as he has managed to keep the president onside, thanks in large part to his unbridled flattery of the US leader.

He has praised Trump for tackling the threat from Iran and continues to insist he has made Nato stronger by cajoling Europeans to up defence spending.

“Nato is stronger today than it has ever been,” he said last week.

‘Roller-coaster’

A major test looks set to come when Trump comes face-to-face with Nato’s 31 other leaders at a summit in Ankara in July — with some hoping the bad blood might have cleared by then.

“The only good news on Ankara is that there is still some time — three or four months in Trump terms is a lot,” the Nato diplomat said.

Even if this row passes, the alliance needs to brace for further tumult as long as Trump is in charge.

“I wouldn’t say it’s in perma-crisis, but rather on a kind of roller-coaster for the next three years or so,” John Deni, a non-resident fellow at the Atlantic Council think tank, told AFP.

Meanwhile, among European allies there is a growing sense that Trump has once again reinforced the fundamental fact that they need to take their defence more into their own hands.

“What we want to do is to strengthen Europe’s defence within the Atlantic alliance,” French armed forces minister Alice Rufo said.

“That creates reliability and trust.”

Opinion

Editorial

Kashmir unresolved
Updated 30 Sep, 2026

Kashmir unresolved

The just solution lies in India addressing the issue through a trilateral dialogue involving the legitimate representatives of the Kashmiri people and Pakistan.
Water shortage
30 Sep, 2026

Water shortage

THAT the country is entering the Rabi season with an anticipated water shortage of nearly 25pc, the lowest carryover...
Young hearts
30 Sep, 2026

Young hearts

THE observance may have passed, but the message of World Heart Day should not fade with it. The occasion is a useful...
Terror and politics
Updated 29 Sep, 2026

Terror and politics

There is an urgent need to tone down the rhetoric and tackle terrorism as a collective challenge for both the affected provinces and the federation.
Watching the glaciers
29 Sep, 2026

Watching the glaciers

THE latest signs from Pakistan’s mountains are worrying. Suparco says the number of unfrozen glacial lakes it...
Dangerous agenda
29 Sep, 2026

Dangerous agenda

AS the world remains fixated on the US-Iran conflict, elsewhere in the Middle East, Israel is consolidating its grip...