Trade war: a losing situation for all

Published
0

US President Donald Trump, during a meeting with visiting Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba, announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on multiple countries next week, escalating the risk of a global trade war. In today’s era of global interconnectedness and economic interdependence, the tariff wars initiated by the US threaten to disrupt international commerce and sow the seeds of discord among countries.

Driven by a combination of economic concerns, political strategy, and ideological beliefs, Trump has once again embraced tariffs as the means to address perceived trade imbalances, protect US industries, and extort concessions from trading partners.

On his inauguration for his second term in office, the White House issued Trump’s “America First Trade Policy” memo, saying: “I am establishing a robust and reinvigorated trade policy that promotes investment and productivity, enhances our nation’s industrial and technological advantages, defends our economic and national security, and above all benefits American workers, manufacturers, farmers, ranchers, entrepreneurs and businesses.”

But the reality is that any trade war is a double-edged sword. While such rhetoric resonates with his political base, particularly in areas of the US that have experienced the loss of manufacturing jobs as a result of globalisation, the tariff wars his administration is waging will not achieve those aims. The US tariff policies have triggered a surge in global trade protectionism. The potential consequences include reduced productivity, higher costs for businesses, and slower economic growth. As Mary Lovely, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, said, they are a huge gamble, and “a recipe for slowing down the economy and increasing inflation”.

Trump’s trade policies contribute to the complexity and instability of the global economic landscape

The tariff battles will produce no winners and will not achieve the desired effects for the US. While tariffs might offer protection for specific industries and address trade imbalances in the short term, they fail to promote long-term investment and productivity. Retaliatory tariffs from trading partners can harm export-dependent manufacturing industries and agriculture, putting jobs at risk. Moreover, trade wars erode trust with trading partners, potentially leading to retaliatory measures that harm the US defense sector’s industrial base and disruptions to global supply chains on which many US defence and technology industries rely.

Tariffs are a crude and simple weapon of the Trump administration’s beggar-thy-neighbor economic nationalism that aims to reinforce US primacy. But the notion of a winner in a trade war is a fallacy, as the destructive ripple effects of protectionist measures spread far beyond the immediate participa­nts, inflicting harm on economies, businesses, and consumers around the globe.

The uncertainty surrounding US diplomatic and economic policies is having an increasingly significant impact on the global economy and international relations. Trump’s trade policies contribute to the complexity and instability of the global economic landscape. This uncertainty makes it difficult for businesses to plan and invest, further dampening economic growth. They are especially harmful to small and medium-sized businesses. China is fully aware of the damaging consequences of trade wars. But the US administration has left it with no choice but to respond with countermeasures. It will not submit to external pressure.

Given the fact that many countries are struggling to recover their economic growth, what the Trump administration is doing will cast a pall on the prospect of the development of the world economy.

By standing up to the US and imposing carefully targeted countermeasures, China is not only showing that it will not be bullied but also demonstrating that it is a staunch defender of free trade and globalisation. China is ready and willing to strengthen its relationships with other countries to oppose the US’ harmful unilateralism.

Beijing urges the Trump administration to engage in dialogue. Rather than resorting to adversarial tactics, nations should engage in talks and seek mutual understanding to resolve trade disputes and foster inclusive growth. Coopera­tion and collaboration are essential to address the complex challenges facing the global economy and to ensure a more stable and prosperous future for all.

Published in Dawn, February 10th, 2025

Opinion

Editorial

Kashmir unresolved
Updated 30 Sep, 2026

Kashmir unresolved

The just solution lies in India addressing the issue through a trilateral dialogue involving the legitimate representatives of the Kashmiri people and Pakistan.
Water shortage
30 Sep, 2026

Water shortage

THAT the country is entering the Rabi season with an anticipated water shortage of nearly 25pc, the lowest carryover...
Young hearts
30 Sep, 2026

Young hearts

THE observance may have passed, but the message of World Heart Day should not fade with it. The occasion is a useful...
Terror and politics
Updated 29 Sep, 2026

Terror and politics

There is an urgent need to tone down the rhetoric and tackle terrorism as a collective challenge for both the affected provinces and the federation.
Watching the glaciers
29 Sep, 2026

Watching the glaciers

THE latest signs from Pakistan’s mountains are worrying. Suparco says the number of unfrozen glacial lakes it...
Dangerous agenda
29 Sep, 2026

Dangerous agenda

AS the world remains fixated on the US-Iran conflict, elsewhere in the Middle East, Israel is consolidating its grip...