JCP panel to frame evaluation rules for judges on 26 Sept

Published
0

ISLAMABAD: A five-member committee of the Judicial Commission of Pakistan (JCP), headed by Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhail, will meet again on Sept 26 to resume the unfinished agenda it left during its last sitting on Aug 22.

The agenda relates to framing rules for the judicial performance evaluation of judges of all high courts and suggesting criteria for the elevation of judges to the superior judiciary.

Although the rules are yet to be framed, the 26th Constitution Amendment had amended Article 175A of the Constitution, emphasising that if the performance of a high court judge was found lacking or inefficient, the JCP would grant the judge a certain period for improvement, as deemed appropriate.

If, after the completion of this period, the judge’s performance was still found to be inefficient, the commission would send its report to the Supreme Judicial Council (SJC) with a recommendation for removal.

The amendment also requires the commission to conduct an annual performance evaluation of high court judges. It further empowers the commission to make separate rules to establish effective standards for such evaluations.

Similarly, the 26th Amendment amended Article 177, which now stipulates that no one may be elevated as a judge of the Supreme Court unless he is a citizen of Pakistan and has either served as a judge of a high court for at least five years or has practiced as an advocate of a high court for not less than 15 years and is also an advocate of the Supreme Court.

On June 19, Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Yahya Afridi constituted a broad-based committee on judicial performance evaluation of high court judges. The body includes members from the judiciary, parliament, executive and the legal fraternity. It was tasked with preparing draft rules for annual judicial performance evaluations and developing criteria for the selection of judges in the superior courts.

At its last meeting, the committee had deferred the agenda of framing rules for regulating judicial performance evaluations, though it acknowledged that Article 175A(4) of the Constitution empowers it to develop such rules. The matter will now be taken up again in the near future.

Published in Dawn, September 23rd, 2025

Opinion

Editorial

Kashmir unresolved
Updated 30 Sep, 2026

Kashmir unresolved

The just solution lies in India addressing the issue through a trilateral dialogue involving the legitimate representatives of the Kashmiri people and Pakistan.
Water shortage
30 Sep, 2026

Water shortage

THAT the country is entering the Rabi season with an anticipated water shortage of nearly 25pc, the lowest carryover...
Young hearts
30 Sep, 2026

Young hearts

THE observance may have passed, but the message of World Heart Day should not fade with it. The occasion is a useful...
Terror and politics
Updated 29 Sep, 2026

Terror and politics

There is an urgent need to tone down the rhetoric and tackle terrorism as a collective challenge for both the affected provinces and the federation.
Watching the glaciers
29 Sep, 2026

Watching the glaciers

THE latest signs from Pakistan’s mountains are worrying. Suparco says the number of unfrozen glacial lakes it...
Dangerous agenda
29 Sep, 2026

Dangerous agenda

AS the world remains fixated on the US-Iran conflict, elsewhere in the Middle East, Israel is consolidating its grip...