Peshawar High Court bans use of govt resources for political rallies in KP

Published
0
Petitioner Aitzazul Haque has requested the high court to proceed under the contempt laws against eight of the respondents. — APP/File
Petitioner Aitzazul Haque has requested the high court to proceed under the contempt laws against eight of the respondents. — APP/File

• Rules right to protest is not absolute, must follow law
• Orders authorities to use state resources only for public service, law & order

PESHAWAR: The Peshawar High Court has declared the use of government resources for organising demonstrations or processions illegal, directing the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa government not to utilise its employees, vehicles, public funds, fuel, or government facilities — directly or indirectly — for such purposes.

A bench comprising Justice Sahibzada Asadullah and Justice Inamullah Khan ordered: “Administrative authorities and law enforcement agencies shall ensure that state resources are deployed exclusively for lawful governmental functions, including the provision of public services, maintenance of law and order, and protection of citizens.”

“While the right to peaceful protest is a cornerstone of democratic governance, it is neither unfettered nor absolute,” the bench ruled.

The bench issued a detailed 28-page judgement on Thursday while disposing of a petition filed by former MPA Javed Naseem, who had requested the court to restrain the chief minister and the KP government from using official vehicles, machinery, or other resources for participation in or facilitation of public meetings, rallies, or long marches.

The petition was filed two days ahead of a public meeting scheduled for Th­­urs­day, announced by the PTI, which was later called off on Wednesday night.

Advocate Anwarul Haq appeared for the petitioner, while Advocate General Shah Faisal Uthmankhel represented the KP government.

Highlighting the constitutional responsibilities of the chief minister as custodian of state resources, the bench also issued directives to government functionaries, including the KP chief secretary and the IGP.

The bench directed the chief secretary to ensure that every department and institution under the provincial administration operates strictly within the confines of its constitutional and legal mandate.

“It must be ensured, with unwavering vigilance, that public resources, administrative authority, and the services of government employees are not, under any circumstances, diverted toward political activities or partisan objectives,” the bench ordered.

While issuing directives to the KP IGP, the bench stated:

“He shall, in faithful discharge of his constitutional and statutory obligations, marshal all available resources to strengthen and maintain the rule of law and the security of the province.”

“It shall be his duty to ensure that the authority, manpower, and institutional capacity of the police remain wholly insulated from political deployment and are directed solely toward the protection of the life, liberty, and property of citizens. The preservation of law and order and the unwavering enforcement of the law must remain the central and unambiguous mission of the department under his command.”

“We expect that the Honourable Chief Min­is­ter, the Chief Secretary, and the Inspector Gen­eral of Police shall ensure faithful, prompt, and effective compliance with the directions issued herein, both in letter and in spirit. However, should there be any lapse, reluctance, or failure in implementation, this court shall be constrai­ned to take stern and appropriate measures as warranted under the law to uphold the rule of law and safeguard public trust,” the bench warned.

‘Sacred trust’

Emphasising that public resources constitute a sacred trust and that the chief minister, by virtue of his office, is its constitutional custodian, the bench ruled:

“It is incumbent upon him to ensure that these resources are employed with the highest degree of integrity, prudence, and responsibility, exclusively for the welfare and advancement of the people, and never for purposes inconsistent with the spirit of public trust or constitutional governance.”

“They are to be employed exclusively for the welfare, security, and advancement of the people. The machinery of government and the administrative apparatus of the state must remain devoted to the purposes for which they were constitutionally created,” the bench observed.

Published in Dawn, April 10th, 2026

Opinion

Editorial

Kashmir unresolved
Updated 30 Sep, 2026

Kashmir unresolved

The just solution lies in India addressing the issue through a trilateral dialogue involving the legitimate representatives of the Kashmiri people and Pakistan.
Water shortage
30 Sep, 2026

Water shortage

THAT the country is entering the Rabi season with an anticipated water shortage of nearly 25pc, the lowest carryover...
Young hearts
30 Sep, 2026

Young hearts

THE observance may have passed, but the message of World Heart Day should not fade with it. The occasion is a useful...
Terror and politics
Updated 29 Sep, 2026

Terror and politics

There is an urgent need to tone down the rhetoric and tackle terrorism as a collective challenge for both the affected provinces and the federation.
Watching the glaciers
29 Sep, 2026

Watching the glaciers

THE latest signs from Pakistan’s mountains are worrying. Suparco says the number of unfrozen glacial lakes it...
Dangerous agenda
29 Sep, 2026

Dangerous agenda

AS the world remains fixated on the US-Iran conflict, elsewhere in the Middle East, Israel is consolidating its grip...