Trump briefed on military options against Iran, but sticks to diplomatic negotiations for now: report

Published
0
US President Donald Trump listens to remarks during a swearing-in ceremony for Administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Mehmet Oz in the Oval Office in Washington, DC, US, April 18, 2025. —Reuters/ File
US President Donald Trump listens to remarks during a swearing-in ceremony for Administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Mehmet Oz in the Oval Office in Washington, DC, US, April 18, 2025. —Reuters/ File

WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump has held a series of meetings with senior national security officials to review US policy towards Iran, including whether Washington should continue negotiations with Tehran or resume broader military strikes, according to the Wall Street Journal.

Trump has been briefed on options for a possible return to broader military confrontation with Iran but has, for now, chosen to continue diplomatic negotiations, according to a report by the Wall Street Journal citing US officials familiar with internal deliberations.

The Journal said the discussions involved Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth and Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Dan Caine, as officials assessed whether the United States should abandon talks with Tehran and resume full-scale military strikes. Some officials involved in the deliberations reportedly described the harder option internally as “finishing the job”.

While the deliberations reflect renewed debate within the administration over escalation, the report said Trump has not made a final decision and has instead leaned toward maintaining the diplomatic track, arguing that large-scale military action could disrupt fragile negotiations over Iran’s nuclear programme.

According to the WSJ, the president has also told advisers he is comfortable allowing nuclear negotiations with Tehran to extend beyond an August 18 deadline, effectively giving diplomacy additional time to produce results. Officials cited in the report said this flexibility reflects an effort to avoid locking Washington into a rigid timetable while talks remain in progress.

At the same time, Trump is said to remain open to limited retaliatory measures, including “one-off” strikes in response to Iranian violations of a memorandum of understanding (MoU) that previously helped structure a fragile ceasefire arrangement. Such calibrated responses, officials suggested, are seen within parts of the administration as a way to apply pressure without escalating into a wider war.

The WSJ report also noted that indirect negotiations are continuing in Doha. US envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner have are in Doha for a new round of mediator-led discussions, according to the US, but Iran has ruled out any meeting with the United States in the Qatari capital.

A central sticking point in the negotiations remains Iran’s push to impose service charges on commercial shipping passing through the Strait of Hormuz, a strategic waterway through which a significant portion of global energy supplies flows. The United States has rejected the proposal, insisting that the strait remain open to free transit under international norms.

US Energy Secretary Chris Wright was cited in the WSJ report as saying that Iran has not been cooperative in broader discussions, while he credited US naval escort operations for stabilising global oil flows despite continued tensions in the region.

To reduce the risk of miscalculation, officials confirmed that Washington has established a crisis communication channel between the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and US Central Command. The channel, described as already active, is intended to manage escalation risks even as diplomatic and military pressures continue in parallel.

Analysts quoted in the report, including Brookings Institution scholar Suzanne Maloney, said the administration still retains tools short of war, such as financial leverage over frozen Iranian assets and economic pressure linked to maritime access.

However, they cautioned that such measures may have a limited impact if core disagreements over Iran’s nuclear programme and regional posture remain unresolved.

The developments underscore an ongoing policy tension in Washington between sustaining diplomatic momentum and maintaining credible military deterrence, as the administration seeks to avoid a renewed large-scale conflict while keeping pressure on Tehran.

Opinion

Editorial

Kashmir unresolved
Updated 30 Sep, 2026

Kashmir unresolved

The just solution lies in India addressing the issue through a trilateral dialogue involving the legitimate representatives of the Kashmiri people and Pakistan.
Water shortage
30 Sep, 2026

Water shortage

THAT the country is entering the Rabi season with an anticipated water shortage of nearly 25pc, the lowest carryover...
Young hearts
30 Sep, 2026

Young hearts

THE observance may have passed, but the message of World Heart Day should not fade with it. The occasion is a useful...
Terror and politics
Updated 29 Sep, 2026

Terror and politics

There is an urgent need to tone down the rhetoric and tackle terrorism as a collective challenge for both the affected provinces and the federation.
Watching the glaciers
29 Sep, 2026

Watching the glaciers

THE latest signs from Pakistan’s mountains are worrying. Suparco says the number of unfrozen glacial lakes it...
Dangerous agenda
29 Sep, 2026

Dangerous agenda

AS the world remains fixated on the US-Iran conflict, elsewhere in the Middle East, Israel is consolidating its grip...