Lull in fighting

Published
0

AFTER two weeks of escalating violence, the US has halted its strikes on Iran, with Tehran also silencing it guns. But rather than any newfound belief in the benefits of peace, the Trump administration may have made the U-turn on account of the mounting practical costs of continuing the conflict.

Moreover, efforts by regional states, including Pakistan, may have also helped convince both sides to give diplomacy another chance. Whatever the motivations for the belligerents to refrain from hostilities, the cessation of conflict in the Gulf is a welcome development, and it is hoped that the dialogue process can be brought back on track and a more permanent peace established in the region.

America’s ambassador to the UN said that President Donald Trump wanted to give “talks some space”. While that may be so, there are also reports in the US media — denied by Mr Trump — that America was running low on munitions. Besides, some of America’s top generals have reportedly advised their bosses in the Pentagon and White House not to escalate matters with Iran. Mr Trump’s decision to halt hostilities may also have been impacted by the rising economic cost of the war.

Furthermore, hostilities in the Gulf have expanded to the Red Sea, with the pro-Iran Houthis enforcing a blockade of Saudi ships. If this conflict escalates, it could have a devastating impact on the global economy, as two major chokepoints for marine traffic — the Strait of Hormuz and Bab al-Mandeb — face indefinite closure.

While Mr Trump has done the right thing by stopping the attacks, he should realise that this war was a mistake from day one, and a negotiated settlement with Iran would have a better solution. Tehran must also show flexibility over the Hormuz issue and ensure that a long-term arrangement guarantees free passage for vessels through this critical waterway.

Yet, this respite from attacks does not necessarily signal the return of peace. Related conflicts in Lebanon and Yemen can lead to the resumption of fighting in the Gulf. Therefore, the mediators who are trying to revive the peace process as per the Islamabad MoU also need to convince the Houthis and the Saudis to revive their ceasefire. In Lebanon, Israel continues its brutal attacks.

In this regard, Iranian Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei has said that peace with the US will only be possible if there is peace in Lebanon. It should be remembered that the Lebanese ceasefire was an integral part of the MoU. Also, Ukraine’s targeting of an Iranian ship in the Caspian Sea is a dangerous escalation. Kyiv’s Western supporters should advise it to stay out of what is already a very complicated theatre. It is hoped that the current lull can lead to a sustainable peace across the Middle East’s volatile front lines.

Published in Dawn, July 28th, 2026

Opinion

Editorial

Kashmir unresolved
Updated 30 Sep, 2026

Kashmir unresolved

The just solution lies in India addressing the issue through a trilateral dialogue involving the legitimate representatives of the Kashmiri people and Pakistan.
Water shortage
30 Sep, 2026

Water shortage

THAT the country is entering the Rabi season with an anticipated water shortage of nearly 25pc, the lowest carryover...
Young hearts
30 Sep, 2026

Young hearts

THE observance may have passed, but the message of World Heart Day should not fade with it. The occasion is a useful...
Terror and politics
Updated 29 Sep, 2026

Terror and politics

There is an urgent need to tone down the rhetoric and tackle terrorism as a collective challenge for both the affected provinces and the federation.
Watching the glaciers
29 Sep, 2026

Watching the glaciers

THE latest signs from Pakistan’s mountains are worrying. Suparco says the number of unfrozen glacial lakes it...
Dangerous agenda
29 Sep, 2026

Dangerous agenda

AS the world remains fixated on the US-Iran conflict, elsewhere in the Middle East, Israel is consolidating its grip...