New administrative units ‘under serious consideration’

Published
2
A vehicle drives past the Prime Minister's residence building in Islamabad, Pakistan March 25, 2026. — Reuters/File
A vehicle drives past the Prime Minister's residence building in Islamabad, Pakistan March 25, 2026. — Reuters/File

• Top govt functionary thinks discussion could be precursor to proposed 28th Constitutional Amendment
• Proposals include bringing Karachi, Gwadar under federal control; splitting Punjab into three, KP into two units

ISLAMABAD: There is a serious debate underway in power corridors over the most feasible approach to creating new provinces, according to a top government functionary, who thinks the discussion is a precursor to the proposed 28th Constitutional Amendment.

The government source, who is privy to developments, was reluctant to say when the proposal — still said to be in the initial stages — could materialise.

He conceded, however, that turning the idea of new administrative into reality would not be easy, as building a consensus among major political parties, which appear opposed to the idea, would be a major challenge.

The functionary said discussions were focused on whether new provinces should be created and, if so, how many would suffice; whether more administrative units should instead be established; or whether the local government system should be revived and empowered.

According to the source, the most effective way to address the consequences of the 18th Amendment was to create new provinces. He said this could help resolve many of the problems faced by the federal government following the devolution of powers to the provinces.

Recently, while addressing the Pakistan Economic Summit 2026, Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi urged all political parties to resolve key national issues, including the creation of new provinces, describing it as the only solution to improving the country’s overall condition, which he said had “collapsed”.

The issue gained momentum after the minister’s proposal drew strong reactions from government ministers, while the country’s leading lawyers’ bodies adopted divergent positions. The Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) backed the proposal, whereas the Pakistan Bar Council (PBC) stressed that any such move must be pursued strictly within the constitutional fram­ework, through parliament and with national consensus.

Speaking at a Full Court Reference held at the Supreme Court in honour of Justice Musarrat Hilali on her retirement, SCBA President Haroonur Rashid said the association endorsed and supported the proposal to create new provinces.

He said the SCBA believed that any constitutional measure to create additional provinces would promote better governance through devolution and equitable administration at the grassroots level, create equal opportunities for balanced economic development and strengthen political stability.

The creation of more provinces, he added, would also help improve living standards by addressing the economic hardships faced by people.

The PBC, the apex representative body of the legal fraternity, meanwhile, said at its 250th meeting that all constitutional matters must be addressed strictly within the framework of the Constitution.

How many more?

The government functionary said that if it was ultimately decided that creating more provinces was the only solution to what the interior minister had described as a “collapsing system”, the next question would be how many provinces should be created.

Under one proposal being discussed, he said, Karachi and Gwadar could come under the administrative control of the federal government, while the rest of Sindh would remain a single province.

Similarly, Balochistan could be divided into two provinces, while Punjab could be divided into three. Khyber Pakhtun­khwa, however, presents a more complicated case beca­use of the merger of the erstwhile Federally Administered Tribal Areas (Fata) and the inco­rporation of areas previously administered under the Fata and Pata arrangements into the provincial constitutional, legal and judicial framework.

The source said KP could nevertheless be divided into Pakhtun and Hazara regions.

Stronger local govt

Alternatively, he said, if the decision was taken to strengthen the local government system, funds for local governments could be channelled directly through the federal government instead of the provinces.

Had the local government system introduced during the late President Pervez Musharraf’s tenure continued uninterrupted, he said, a large pool of experienced and competent councillors would have been available to address local issues effectively.

“Unfortunately, reaching that level of experience and building such a team will now take considerable time,” he added.

Published in Dawn, August 15th, 2026

Opinion

Editorial

Kashmir unresolved
Updated 30 Sep, 2026

Kashmir unresolved

The just solution lies in India addressing the issue through a trilateral dialogue involving the legitimate representatives of the Kashmiri people and Pakistan.
Water shortage
30 Sep, 2026

Water shortage

THAT the country is entering the Rabi season with an anticipated water shortage of nearly 25pc, the lowest carryover...
Young hearts
30 Sep, 2026

Young hearts

THE observance may have passed, but the message of World Heart Day should not fade with it. The occasion is a useful...
Terror and politics
Updated 29 Sep, 2026

Terror and politics

There is an urgent need to tone down the rhetoric and tackle terrorism as a collective challenge for both the affected provinces and the federation.
Watching the glaciers
29 Sep, 2026

Watching the glaciers

THE latest signs from Pakistan’s mountains are worrying. Suparco says the number of unfrozen glacial lakes it...
Dangerous agenda
29 Sep, 2026

Dangerous agenda

AS the world remains fixated on the US-Iran conflict, elsewhere in the Middle East, Israel is consolidating its grip...