CINEMASCOPE: WHEN DINOSAURS AREN’T THE PROBLEM

Published
0

A family surviving by barricading them­selves in their house to hide from hostile creatures — sounds like a familiar plot, doesn’t it? Last week, the premise found a home on Netflix’s The Last House, and this week, the bubble — literally and figuratively — expands to The End of Oak Street.

Now, it is not uncommon for films with similar concepts to release mere weeks and months apart — cases in point: Armageddon and Deep Impact in 1998, Antz and A Bug’s Life in the same year, Dante’s Peak and Volcano a year earlier, Olympus Has Fallen and White House Down in 2013. The end result, however, banks largely on what the writer, director, producer and studio have in mind for the story in question. The underlying question, therefore, is: how big do they want to go?

For The End of Oak Street — whose writer-director is David Robert Mitchell (It Follows) and producers include J.J. Abrams (Star Trek, Star Wars) — the answer is obvious: as big as they can go, while keeping nostalgia strictly within sight.

Oak Street is set in its titular neighbourhood in Flowervale, Michigan. The year is 1982, a time when families weren’t plagued much by modern technology. The most they had, as we see time and again, were Walkmans (portable audio cassette players) that ran on standard AA batteries.

Despite some fine performances and a good enough story and pacing, at the end, there seems to be something missing from The End of Oak Street

The Platt family, like all of their quiet suburban neighbours, lives a seemingly happy life, partaking in sack races and eating Frosties together while watching the morning broadcast on their 16-inch CRT television. However, their contentment hides issues that can be easily overcome with a few days of heart-to-heart conversations.

Denise (Anne Hathaway) feels trapped in her marriage, and secretly writes an autobiographical novel as a means of escape. Greg (Ewan McGregor), braving a severe blow to his pride after losing his job, hides a pizza delivery gig and a drinking problem from his family. Their daughter, Audrey (Maisey Stella), feels the heavy weight of her parents’ failing marriage, and stresses over her future and college aspirations. Brian (Christian Convery), her younger brother, deals with typical kid anxieties: neighbourhood bullies and a tendency to run away from responsibilities. Their dog, Starbuck, does what dogs typically do: runs away to poop on the neighbour’s yard. The excrement, however, is five feet high and four feet wide!

Amidst Michael Giacchino’s unrelenting background score — which takes you back to Steven Spielberg’s fantastical 1980s Americana — we see flashes of light and big bubbles that first bring dinosaurs to Oak Street, and then teleport the whole neighbourhood to the prehistoric age. This is where the balancing act tilts in favour of a survival film and out goes most depth.

Though David Robert Mitchell’s film does feign some measure of intelligence, the payoff, especially the climax — which I will not spoil here — takes the story, and Denise’s character, to a very dark place. The ending is meant to give her a sense of peace, though at what cost? Neither the characters nor the filmmakers are bothered by the matter-of-fact way the film ends — everything is just hunky-dory, yet it shouldn’t be.

I’ve always maintained that the opening and ending are the most important aspects of a film. The start introduces the characters, their world, and their dilemmas, while the end — no matter how badly or brilliantly it is handled — leaves the audience with a lasting, encapsulating feeling of the experience. In simpler terms: the ending stays with you and impacts your view of the film itself — especially when, in hindsight, you ask yourself what you actually saw.

Sure, the performances turned out fine (Hathaway and McGregor are fine actors, the youngsters, not so much), the director made smart creative and technical decisions, and the pace and story were good enough — yet why doesn’t the film feel that good, especially if the sum of its parts were on point?

Because somewhere along the line, the filmmaker took the easy way out. In retrospect, it wasn’t the dinosaurs, but a creative choice, that ended The End of Oak Street.

Playing in cinemas worldwide, The End of Oak Street is rated PG-13 and features an intimate scene between dinosaurs amidst the usual snapping and off-screen decapitations of people

The writer is Icon’s primary film reviewer

Published in Dawn, ICON, August 23rd, 2026

Opinion

Editorial

Kashmir unresolved
Updated 30 Sep, 2026

Kashmir unresolved

The just solution lies in India addressing the issue through a trilateral dialogue involving the legitimate representatives of the Kashmiri people and Pakistan.
Water shortage
30 Sep, 2026

Water shortage

THAT the country is entering the Rabi season with an anticipated water shortage of nearly 25pc, the lowest carryover...
Young hearts
30 Sep, 2026

Young hearts

THE observance may have passed, but the message of World Heart Day should not fade with it. The occasion is a useful...
Terror and politics
Updated 29 Sep, 2026

Terror and politics

There is an urgent need to tone down the rhetoric and tackle terrorism as a collective challenge for both the affected provinces and the federation.
Watching the glaciers
29 Sep, 2026

Watching the glaciers

THE latest signs from Pakistan’s mountains are worrying. Suparco says the number of unfrozen glacial lakes it...
Dangerous agenda
29 Sep, 2026

Dangerous agenda

AS the world remains fixated on the US-Iran conflict, elsewhere in the Middle East, Israel is consolidating its grip...