LHC hears Junaid Hafeez's appeal in blasphemy case, seeks prosecution's arguments on admissibility of digital evidence

Published
1
A photo of the Lahore High Court — AFP/File
A photo of the Lahore High Court — AFP/File

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court (LHC) took up former university lecturer Junaid Hafeez’s appeal against his death sentence in a blasphemy case on Tuesday, seeking arguments from the prosecution on the admissibility of electronic evidence.

Hafeez was sentenced to death in 2019 and his appeal against his conviction has been pending since 2020.

A two-judge bench, comprising Justices Sadiq Mahmud Khurram and Muhammad Jawad Zafar, took up the appeal on Tuesday as complainant’s lawyer, Advocate Athar Shah Bokhari, and Hafeez’s lawyer, Advocate Asad Jamal, appeared before the court.

The hearing began with the bench observing that formal notices had not been issued to the parties since the transfer of Hafeez’s appeal from the Multan bench to the principal seat.

The case was transferred on the request of Hafeez’s lawyer in December 2021.

During the hearing on Tuesday, the LHC issued notices on the appeal, which the lawyers for the prosecution and the complainant received in the court.

The court further stated that it would like to hear the prosecution on the admissibility of electronic evidence involved in the case and the Facebook page attributed to Hafeez.

It then decided to adjourn the hearing till Oct 7, but the complainant’s counsel sought a longer adjournment to prepare his arguments.

The bench then said it would announce the date of the next hearing later and eventually scheduled the hearing for Oct 10.

Hafeez — a former visiting lecturer at the Department of English Literature of the Bahauddin Zakariya University (BZU) — was arrested by police on March 13, 2013 and his trial in the blasphemy case, linked to Facebook uploads, began in 2014.

He was sentenced to death by a Multan district and sessions court on December 21, 2019 on blasphemy charges and subsequently appealed his conviction in 2020.

At least seven judges were transferred through the course of Hafeez’s case. As many as 15 prosecution witnesses recorded their statements against Hafeez while 11 others were not called after being declared irrelevant.

The trial was shifted to the Multan Central Jail in April 2014 by the Punjab home department due to security concerns.

One of Hafeez’s previous lawyer, Rashid Rehman, was shot dead in May 2014 in his office. The month prior to it, the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan had expressed serious concerns when death threats were extended to Rehman, also the special task force coordinator of the commission.

In December 2014, another lawyer representing Hafeez also received a threat letter from the militant Islamic State group, warning him to withdraw from the case.

The hearing of the appeal has also been deferred multiple times.

Opinion

Editorial

Kashmir unresolved
Updated 30 Sep, 2026

Kashmir unresolved

The just solution lies in India addressing the issue through a trilateral dialogue involving the legitimate representatives of the Kashmiri people and Pakistan.
Water shortage
30 Sep, 2026

Water shortage

THAT the country is entering the Rabi season with an anticipated water shortage of nearly 25pc, the lowest carryover...
Young hearts
30 Sep, 2026

Young hearts

THE observance may have passed, but the message of World Heart Day should not fade with it. The occasion is a useful...
Terror and politics
Updated 29 Sep, 2026

Terror and politics

There is an urgent need to tone down the rhetoric and tackle terrorism as a collective challenge for both the affected provinces and the federation.
Watching the glaciers
29 Sep, 2026

Watching the glaciers

THE latest signs from Pakistan’s mountains are worrying. Suparco says the number of unfrozen glacial lakes it...
Dangerous agenda
29 Sep, 2026

Dangerous agenda

AS the world remains fixated on the US-Iran conflict, elsewhere in the Middle East, Israel is consolidating its grip...