Healthcare business

Published Updated
0

THE rising rate of Caesarean section (CS) deliveries in Pakistan does warrant close attention. A CS can be necessary and life-saving in certain circumstances, but when this surgical and invasive procedure is performed without a clear medical indication, we must ask an uncomfortable question: are financial incentives actually influencing decisions about how women give birth?

According to the Pakistan Demographic and Health Survey (PDHS), the CS rate in the country has risen from 14 per cent to 22pc in just five years. The survey also indicates that CS rates are significantly higher in private-sector hospitals than in public-sector facilities. This is particularly concerning because private healthcare in Pakistan commonly operates under a fee-for-service model and other financial arrangements that may create incentives for additional procedures.

A CS can generate additional charges for surgery, hospital services, medicines and longer inpatient stays. This creates a potential conflict of interest when the financial benefit of a procedure is linked to the decision to perform it. This is not to suggest that every doctor recommending a CS is motivated by financial gains. The concern is over the possibility of financial incentives influencing some decisions.

Unnecessary CS can expose mothers and newborns to avoidable risks. Babies thus delivered may have a higher risk of certain breathing problems, while mothers generally face a longer recovery period. A CS can also have implications for future pregnancies. It is vital to monitor CS rates, particularly in private hospitals. Hospitals should be subject to clinical audits, and patients should be given clear, understandable explanations about why a CS is being recommended. Where circumstances permit, women should also be encouraged to seek a second medical opinion.

The objective here should not be to discourage CS or to reduce its use at all costs. It should be to ensure that every CS is performed for medically relevant reasons, not because the healthcare provider stands to benefit financially from the procedure.

Roshni Kumari
Sukkur

Published in Dawn, September 30th, 2026

Opinion

Editorial

Kashmir unresolved
Updated 30 Sep, 2026

Kashmir unresolved

The just solution lies in India addressing the issue through a trilateral dialogue involving the legitimate representatives of the Kashmiri people and Pakistan.
Water shortage
30 Sep, 2026

Water shortage

THAT the country is entering the Rabi season with an anticipated water shortage of nearly 25pc, the lowest carryover...
Young hearts
30 Sep, 2026

Young hearts

THE observance may have passed, but the message of World Heart Day should not fade with it. The occasion is a useful...
Terror and politics
Updated 29 Sep, 2026

Terror and politics

There is an urgent need to tone down the rhetoric and tackle terrorism as a collective challenge for both the affected provinces and the federation.
Watching the glaciers
29 Sep, 2026

Watching the glaciers

THE latest signs from Pakistan’s mountains are worrying. Suparco says the number of unfrozen glacial lakes it...
Dangerous agenda
29 Sep, 2026

Dangerous agenda

AS the world remains fixated on the US-Iran conflict, elsewhere in the Middle East, Israel is consolidating its grip...